Today's hottest deals

Asus P5Q-PRO

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics3.77% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P5Q-PRO  (all builds)
Memory1.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20090223
Uptime3.2 Days
Run DateApr 09 '19 at 12:34
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo E8400-$53
LGA 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
36.6% Below average
Memory 59.2
1-Core 40.7
2-Core 86.3
39% 62.1 Pts
4-Core 84
8-Core 86.5
11% 85.2 Pts
64-Core 84.9
5% 84.9 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 36.6%
Great: 47%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
Nvidia(10DE 128B) 1GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 398.36
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
3.77% Terrible
Lighting 4.47
Reflection 4.31
Parallax 4.19
4% 4.32 fps
MRender 4.14
Gravity 3.9
Splatting 6.13
4% 4.72 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.77%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$30
59GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 03070009
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 152
Write 4.5
Mixed 75.2
17% 77.1 MB/s
4K Read 17.3
4K Write 29.1
4K Mixed 18.5
65% 21.6 MB/s
DQ Read 147
DQ Write 17.4
DQ Mixed 19.6
30% 61.5 MB/s
Poor: 33% Great: 85%
Kingston DataTraveler R3.0 G2 USB 3.0 32GB-$30
3GB free, PID 16a2
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 28.2
Write 13.2
Mixed 14.7
21% 18.7 MB/s
4K Read 4.7
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.9
65% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 10% Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x1GB
4 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR2
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
20.5% Poor
MC Read 7.1
MC Write 6.5
MC Mixed 6.5
19% 6.7 GB/s
SC Read 5.9
SC Write 6.7
SC Mixed 6.8
18% 6.47 GB/s
Latency 130
31% 130 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 20.5%
Great: 28%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P5Q-PRO Builds (Compare 370 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5Q-PRO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 52% - Above average Total price: $186
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback