Asus STRIX H270F GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 68%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics78.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive79.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus STRIX H270F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory27.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171214
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 07 '19 at 12:29
Run Duration175 Seconds
Run User SGP-User
Background CPU 19%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700-$167
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
82.9% Excellent
Memory 86.3
1-Core 114
2-Core 228
80% 143 Pts
4-Core 428
8-Core 661
67% 545 Pts
64-Core 672
42% 672 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 82.9%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
Zotac(19DA 1445) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 417.35
Performing below potential (42nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
78.4% Very good
Lighting 97.8
Reflection 107
Parallax 99.9
80% 102 fps
MRender 91.8
Gravity 92.7
Splatting 93
76% 92.5 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 78.4%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue SATA M.2 250GB-$89
92GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X41000WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 222 192 185 187 182 150 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
79.5% Very good
Read 465
Write 426
Mixed 238
SusWrite 186
73% 329 MB/s
4K Read 27
4K Write 53.1
4K Mixed 34.1
113% 38.1 MB/s
DQ Read 363
DQ Write 283
DQ Mixed 249
207% 299 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 79.5%
Great: 100%
Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$175
19GB free
Firmware: DXM04B0Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 490
Write 452
Mixed 330
94% 424 MB/s
4K Read 27.8
4K Write 91.7
4K Mixed 42.7
145% 54.1 MB/s
DQ Read 372
DQ Write 331
DQ Mixed 149
167% 284 MB/s
Poor: 68% Great: 116%
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$30
219GB free
Firmware: Z33130RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 348 132 134 134 134 134 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
65% Good
Read 412
Write 406
Mixed 363
SusWrite 170
76% 338 MB/s
4K Read 19.5
4K Write 76.7
4K Mixed 17.1
92% 37.8 MB/s
DQ Read 196
DQ Write 299
DQ Mixed 33.3
85% 176 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 65%
Great: 86%
Samsung HD103SI 1TB-$89
581GB free
Firmware: 1AG01118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 93 94 95 94 94 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
52.1% Above average
Read 87.7
Write 62.7
Mixed 50.2
SusWrite 93.9
54% 73.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
144% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 52.1%
Great: 59%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$62
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 169 173 171 176 177 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 197
Write 150
Mixed 84
SusWrite 172
110% 151 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 106%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMK16GX4M2B3000C15 CMK16GX4M2A2400C14 CMK16GX4M2B3000C15 CMK16GX4M2A2400C14 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
70.1% Very good
MC Read 24.9
MC Write 26.9
MC Mixed 22.2
70% 24.7 GB/s
SC Read 16.4
SC Write 27.2
SC Mixed 21.1
62% 21.6 GB/s
Latency 71
56% 71 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 70.1%
Great: 96%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical STRIX H270F GAMING Builds (Compare 1,839 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus STRIX H270F GAMING - $250

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $743
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback