Today's hottest deals

Acer Aspire M3910

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics15.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive57.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAcer Aspire M3910  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire M3910
Memory13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100517
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 06 '19 at 20:48
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU9%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5 650-$40
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
52.7% Above average
Memory 70.1
1-Core 86.7
2-Core 140
59% 98.9 Pts
4-Core 206
8-Core 208
28% 207 Pts
64-Core 208
13% 208 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 52.7%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$170
CLim: 1583 MHz, MLim: 2120 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.4.1
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
15.8% Very poor
Lighting 0.17
Reflection 62.2
Parallax 74.8
0% 45.7 fps
MRender 64
Gravity 54.2
Splatting 53.3
46% 57.2 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 15.8%
Great: 49%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 500GB-$47
225GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR022
SusWrite @10s intervals: 220 223 193 207 209 203 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
57.6% Above average
Read 220
Write 210
Mixed 213
SusWrite 209
48% 213 MB/s
4K Read 20.5
4K Write 37.9
4K Mixed 27.2
86% 28.5 MB/s
DQ Read 208
DQ Write 198
DQ Mixed 183
143% 196 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 57.6%
Great: 125%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMX8GX3M2A1333C9 029E CMX8GX3M2A1600C9 029E CMX8GX3M2A1333C9 029E CMX8GX3M2A1600C9 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
32% Below average
MC Read 10.4
MC Write 9.1
MC Mixed 14
32% 11.2 GB/s
SC Read 8.7
SC Write 7.2
SC Mixed 8.6
23% 8.17 GB/s
Latency 101
40% 101 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 32%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire M3910 Builds (Compare 172 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire M3910

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $135
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback