HP Compaq Pro 6300 MT

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 73%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics28% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive57.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP Compaq Pro 6300 MT  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 339A
Memory5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130716
Uptime1.9 Days
Run DateApr 04 '19 at 00:13
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User ZAF-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3470-$59
Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-3470 CPU @ 3.20GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
73% Very good
Memory 82
1-Core 96.5
2-Core 194
71% 124 Pts
4-Core 371
8-Core 370
50% 370 Pts
64-Core 366
23% 366 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 73%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
Gigabyte(1458 3766) 2GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 419.67
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
28% Poor
Lighting 34.3
Reflection 25.5
Parallax 31.4
28% 30.4 fps
MRender 38.3
Gravity 32.8
Splatting 32.1
28% 34.4 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 28%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
190GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK71B1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 228 51 54 51 51 52 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
57.5% Above average
Read 317
Write 116
Mixed 315
SusWrite 81.2
46% 207 MB/s
4K Read 23.5
4K Write 45.2
4K Mixed 23.5
90% 30.7 MB/s
DQ Read 233
DQ Write 327
DQ Mixed 167
158% 242 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 57.5%
Great: 100%
WD WD5000AACS-00ZUB0 500GB
413GB free
Firmware: 01.01B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 68 67 67 68 67 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
38.5% Below average
Read 66.5
Write 67.3
Mixed 50.3
SusWrite 67.1
46% 62.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.8
155% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 38.5%
Great: 49%
WD Blue 250GB (2007)-$25
166GB free
Firmware: 03.03E03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 80 80 82 82 82 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
47.1% Average
Read 83.3
Write 83
Mixed 54.5
SusWrite 80.6
56% 75.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 47.1%
Great: 55%
Generic Flash Disk 32GB
29GB free, PID e1f1
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 19 16 19 18 19 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
11.5% Very poor
Read 27.3
Write 6.5
Mixed 11.8
SusWrite 17.3
19% 15.7 MB/s
4K Read 4.2
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.9
77% 2 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 11.5%
Great: 13%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905471-001.A01LF Micron 4JTF25664AZ-1G6E1 9905471-001.A00LF Micron 4JTF25664AZ-1G6E1 8GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
49.7% Average
MC Read 17.3
MC Write 18.2
MC Mixed 15.5
49% 17 GB/s
SC Read 15
SC Write 16.2
SC Mixed 16.2
45% 15.8 GB/s
Latency 77
52% 77 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 49.7%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq Pro 6300 MT Builds (Compare 1,939 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq Pro 6300 MT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback