Today's hottest deals

bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics54% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
System
MotherboardIntel DH67CL
Memory12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111222
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 11 '19 at 19:21
Run Duration162 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU 23%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
71.2% Very good
Memory 83.2
1-Core 91.7
2-Core 156
66% 110 Pts
4-Core 343
8-Core 346
46% 344 Pts
64-Core 342
21% 342 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 71.2%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
EVGA(3842 2975) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1531 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 416.16
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
54% Above average
Lighting 67.2
Reflection 74
Parallax 64.1
55% 68.4 fps
MRender 74
Gravity 64.3
Splatting 57.5
52% 65.2 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 54%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 500GB-$47
104GB free
Firmware: M3CR022
SusWrite @10s intervals: 322 413 394 389 354 341 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
95.9% Outstanding
Read 441
Write 418
Mixed 396
SusWrite 369
92% 406 MB/s
4K Read 28.4
4K Write 56.2
4K Mixed 40.4
125% 41.7 MB/s
DQ Read 391
DQ Write 351
DQ Mixed 295
242% 346 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 95.9%
Great: 125%
Intel 320 Series 120GB-$89
4GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4PC10362
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 196
Write 123
Mixed 133
33% 151 MB/s
4K Read 17.7
4K Write 30.1
4K Mixed 19.7
68% 22.5 MB/s
DQ Read 130
DQ Write 66.4
DQ Mixed 62.7
56% 86.5 MB/s
Poor: 29% Great: 48%
Intenso External USB 3.0 4TB
2TB free
Firmware: 2210
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 29 29 30 28 29 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
18% Very poor
Read 33
Write 26.3
Mixed 25
SusWrite 28.9
21% 28.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
140% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 18%
Great: 97%
Seagate ST3750528AS 750GB-$65
396GB free
Firmware: HP34
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 84 76 63 64 70 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
40% Below average
Read 65.3
Write 69.5
Mixed 56.3
SusWrite 73.7
49% 66.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 1
170% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 40%
Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5474-028.A00LF 9905471-011.A00LF 99U5474-028.A00LF 9905471-011.A00LF 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
49.1% Average
MC Read 16.2
MC Write 18.4
MC Mixed 15.9
48% 16.8 GB/s
SC Read 13.6
SC Write 16.4
SC Mixed 15.3
43% 15.1 GB/s
Latency 74.8
53% 74.8 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 49.1%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,926 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $322
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback