Today's hottest deals

Pegatron SM 3330

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.7% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (46%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemPegatron SM 3330  (all builds)
MotherboardPegatron SM3330
Memory2.6 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130208
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateMar 08 '19 at 00:31
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 46%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X2 565-$200
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
42% Average
Memory 71.7
1-Core 41.5
2-Core 74
42% 62.4 Pts
4-Core 75.1
8-Core 74.9
10% 75 Pts
64-Core 94.9
6% 94.9 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 42%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 8400 GS
MSI(1462 2295) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.1
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
0.7% Terrible
Lighting 0.73
Reflection 1.27
Parallax 0.25
1% 0.75 fps
MRender 2.81
Gravity 0.47
Splatting 0.43
1% 1.24 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.7%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung HD161HJ 160GB-$40
60GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GF100-07
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 31 39 36 24 46 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
27.8% Poor
Read 62.2
Write 54.5
Mixed 30.8
SusWrite 34.4
33% 45.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.7
117% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 27.8%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3x2GB
3 of 4 slots used
6GB DIMM DDR3
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
22.9% Poor
MC Read 8.4
MC Write 6.2
MC Mixed 8.5
22% 7.7 GB/s
SC Read 4.9
SC Write 4.8
SC Mixed 6.1
15% 5.27 GB/s
Latency 97.4
41% 97.4 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 22.9%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical SM 3330 Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: Pegatron SM 3330

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback