Asus ROG STRIX X370-F GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 70%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics81.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive258% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX X370-F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1600 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181209
Uptime3.6 Days
Run DateFeb 17 '19 at 15:29
Run Duration248 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 16%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X-$195
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
79.9% Very good
Memory 72.8
1-Core 116
2-Core 233
77% 141 Pts
4-Core 466
8-Core 917
82% 691 Pts
64-Core 1,287
80% 1,287 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 79.9%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 417.22
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
81.9% Excellent
Lighting 101
Reflection 115
Parallax 96.5
82% 104 fps
MRender 97.4
Gravity 97.2
Splatting 102
81% 98.9 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 81.9%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
320GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 895 662 666 636 666 662 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
258% Outstanding
Read 2,565
Write 2,267
Mixed 1,406
SusWrite 698
386% 1,734 MB/s
4K Read 61
4K Write 124
4K Mixed 79.1
259% 87.9 MB/s
DQ Read 772
DQ Write 655
DQ Mixed 709
532% 712 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 258%
Great: 340%
Samsung 850 EVO 250GB (TurboPC EX)
233GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 369 317 301 292 318 285 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
113% Outstanding
Read 497
Write 458
Mixed 396
SusWrite 314
93% 416 MB/s
4K Read 42.8
4K Write 91.9
4K Mixed 55.5
185% 63.4 MB/s
DQ Read 377
DQ Write 352
DQ Mixed 359
271% 362 MB/s
Poor: 88%
This bench: 113%
Great: 117%
Samsung 850 EVO 500GB (TurboPC EX)
362GB free
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 442 455 429 419 461 411 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
119% Outstanding
Read 492
Write 455
Mixed 406
SusWrite 436
101% 447 MB/s
4K Read 41.3
4K Write 89.2
4K Mixed 54.8
180% 61.8 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 353
DQ Mixed 361
272% 364 MB/s
Poor: 85%
This bench: 119%
Great: 119%
Samsung 840 PRO Series (TurboPC EX) 256GB
104GB free
Firmware: DXM05B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 471 434 438 442 483 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB-$43
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz
Performing below potential (50th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
79.9% Very good
MC Read 30.6
MC Write 29.6
MC Mixed 26.8
83% 29 GB/s
SC Read 19.8
SC Write 29.1
SC Mixed 23.1
69% 24 GB/s
Latency 95
42% 95 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 79.9%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX X370-F GAMING Builds (Compare 947 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 81%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 79%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X370-F GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $513
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback