Today's hottest deals

Asrock Z97 Extreme6

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 70%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics86.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive112% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock Z97 Extreme6  (all builds)
Memory23 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20151006
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 03 '16 at 21:32
Run Duration335 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
91.4% Outstanding
Memory 97.3
1-Core 132
2-Core 263
92% 164 Pts
4-Core 462
8-Core 693
72% 577 Pts
64-Core 694
43% 694 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 91.4%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$449
EVGA(3842 1996) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.6491
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
86.1% Excellent
Lighting 110
Reflection 117
Parallax 116
90% 115 fps
MRender 95.8
Gravity 100
Splatting 94.7
79% 97 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 86.1%
Great: 87%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 512GB
287GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
112% Outstanding
Read 681
Write 737
Mixed 536
146% 652 MB/s
4K Read 29.7
4K Write 113
4K Mixed 10.8
119% 51.2 MB/s
DQ Read 57.9
DQ Write 253
DQ Mixed 36.8
63% 116 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 112%
Great: 332%
Asrock RAM Disk 6GB
3GB free
Firmware: 1.00
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC45 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
88.6% Excellent
Read 174
Write 136
Mixed 33.4
83% 114 MB/s
4K Read 0.68
4K Write 0.56
4K Mixed 0.23
65% 0.49 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 88.6%
Great: 114%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
315GB free
Firmware: CC9F Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
65.8% Good
Read 98.4
Write 131
Mixed 33.6
64% 87.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.04
4K Mixed 0.15
57% 0.56 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 65.8%
Great: 114%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
294GB free
Firmware: CC4H Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 51% Great: 114%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 363GB
67GB free
Firmware: 1.0.
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
59.6% Above average
Read 102
Write 106
Mixed 101
77% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.63
4K Write 1.84
4K Mixed 0.42
107% 0.96 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 59.6%
Great: 61%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
27GB free
Firmware: 80.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
30.3% Below average
Read 52.8
Write 52.3
Mixed 53.1
40% 52.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.46
4K Mixed 0.18
68% 0.71 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 30.3%
Great: 59%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 137GB
1GB free
Firmware: 1.0.
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
29.9% Poor
Read 56.8
Write 47.2
Mixed 33.1
34% 45.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.37
4K Write 1.17
4K Mixed 0.35
76% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 29.9%
Great: 130%
FCR-HS3 -1 64GB
0GB free, PID 6348
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
21.9% Poor
Read 33.1
Write 27.9
Mixed 15.5
31% 25.5 MB/s
4K Read 7.79
4K Write 2.99
4K Mixed 2.1
202% 4.29 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 21.9%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F3 DDR3 2666 C11 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
85.3% Excellent
MC Read 32.7
MC Write 31.9
MC Mixed 25.7
86% 30.1 GB/s
SC Read 20.7
SC Write 24.1
SC Mixed 27.1
68% 24 GB/s
Latency 49.2
81% 49.2 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 85.3%
Great: 137%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z97 Extreme6 Builds (Compare 981 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asrock Z97 Extreme6 - $220

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $853
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $123
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $374WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $253Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback