Today's hottest deals

bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics17.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
System
MotherboardIntel DP67BG
Memory4.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120717
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 13 '19 at 06:43
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
76.2% Very good
Memory 90.7
1-Core 93
2-Core 183
72% 122 Pts
4-Core 359
8-Core 350
48% 355 Pts
64-Core 350
22% 350 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 76.2%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-Ti-$362
EVGA(3842 3660) 2GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 417.35
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
17.9% Very poor
Lighting 20.3
Reflection 23.4
Parallax 19
16% 20.9 fps
MRender 29
Gravity 20.3
Splatting 26.4
21% 25.2 fps
Poor: 23%
This bench: 17.9%
Great: 29%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$31
248GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC6B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 42 65 73 65 75 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
46.7% Average
Read 99.1
Write 97.9
Mixed 57.3
SusWrite 63.5
58% 79.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.6
110% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 46.7%
Great: 68%
PNY USB 2.0 FD 4GB
4GB free, PID 0059
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.4 5.5 5.7 5.7 5.7 5.7 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
5.51% Terrible
Read 21.3
Write 4.5
Mixed 4.5
SusWrite 5.6
9% 8.97 MB/s
4K Read 5.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
19% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.51%
Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 0x484D54333235553642465238432D48392020 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
51% Above average
MC Read 16.9
MC Write 18.6
MC Mixed 16.1
49% 17.2 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 17
SC Mixed 16.8
46% 16.2 GB/s
Latency 66.2
60% 66.2 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 51%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,926 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $322
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback