bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics44.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
System
MotherboardIntel DP55KG
Memory8.1 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110630
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 11 '19 at 11:24
Run Duration157 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 860-$320
LGA 1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
67.7% Good
Memory 92.4
1-Core 81.4
2-Core 145
66% 106 Pts
4-Core 235
8-Core 341
36% 288 Pts
64-Core 327
20% 327 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 67.7%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 780-$329
Asus(1043 8469) 3GB
CLim: 1228 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 399.24
Performing below potential (49th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
44.5% Average
Lighting 53.3
Reflection 49.2
Parallax 70.8
43% 57.8 fps
MRender 66.5
Gravity 59.7
Splatting 48
46% 58 fps
Poor: 41%
This bench: 44.5%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung HD161HJ 160GB-$40
51GB free (System drive)
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 50 38 44 43 44 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
26.4% Poor
Read 49.8
Write 40.9
Mixed 37.6
SusWrite 42
32% 42.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.6
110% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 26.4%
Great: 42%
WD Green 500GB (2009)-$23
247GB free
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 59 57 53 51 50 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
38.4% Below average
Read 79
Write 81.9
Mixed 44.5
SusWrite 54.7
48% 65 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.5
108% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 38.4%
Great: 54%
Seagate Desktop 2TB
251GB free, PID 3300
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 19 19 19 18 18 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
12.6% Very poor
Read 30.3
Write 21.5
Mixed 21.2
SusWrite 18.4
30% 22.9 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
75% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 12.6%
Great: 19%
ST932032 5AS 320GB
35GB free, PID 2329
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 19 19 18 18 18 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
10.8% Very poor
Read 28.9
Write 21.3
Mixed 19.7
SusWrite 18.4
29% 22.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.6
49% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 10.8%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 0x393930353430332D3038332E4130304C4620 0x0198 0x393930353430332D3038332E4130304C4620 0x0198 0x4B48583136303043313044332F3847202020 12GB
1333, 1333, 1600 MHz
2048, 2048, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
27.8% Poor
MC Read 9.4
MC Write 7.8
MC Mixed 7.3
23% 8.17 GB/s
SC Read 9.7
SC Write 10.4
SC Mixed 9.1
28% 9.73 GB/s
Latency 63.4
63% 63.4 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 27.8%
Great: 29%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,531 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback