Asus X541NA

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 30%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 28.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics2.03% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (56%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemAsus X541NA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X541NA
Memory1.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170317
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 27 '18 at 19:18
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU 56%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8550U (4CPUs)
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
28.9% Poor
Memory 43.9
1-Core 47
2-Core 88.2
35% 59.7 Pts
4-Core 81.2
8-Core 89.1
11% 85.1 Pts
64-Core 87.7
5% 87.7 Pts
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics
Asus(1043 16A0) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 21.20.16.4627
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
2.03% Terrible
Lighting 2.2
Reflection 2.81
Parallax 1.94
2% 2.32 fps
MRender 3.05
Gravity 1.87
Splatting 3.91
2% 2.94 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.03%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Momentus Thin 5400.9 2.5" 500GB-$21
442GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0003SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 39 68 72 73 71 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
40.5% Average
Read 81.3
Write 78
Mixed 35.8
SusWrite 59.9
47% 63.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.4
66% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 40.5%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
18.3% Very poor
MC Read 6.3
MC Write 7.5
MC Mixed 5.9
19% 6.57 GB/s
SC Read 3.3
SC Write 3.9
SC Mixed 4.4
11% 3.87 GB/s
Latency 185
22% 185 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 18.3%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X541NA Builds (Compare 402 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 25%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Asus X541NA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback