Today's hottest deals

NEC PC-MK32MEZCF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics1.73% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemNEC PC-MK32MEZCF  (all builds)
MotherboardNEC MS-7777N1
Memory3.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121116
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 17 '18 at 03:15
Run Duration192 Seconds
Run User JPN-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3470-$69
SOCKET1155 MB, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
74.3% Very good
Memory 84.3
1-Core 99.3
2-Core 197
73% 127 Pts
4-Core 371
8-Core 376
50% 374 Pts
64-Core 370
23% 370 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 74.3%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)
Legend(17AA 600F) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4885
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
1.73% Terrible
Lighting 1.77
Reflection 1.77
Parallax 1.34
1% 1.63 fps
MRender 3.57
Gravity 1.1
Splatting 3.48
2% 2.72 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.73%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 500GB-$50
311GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 452 295 451 370 370 346 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 78% Great: 125%
Seagate Expansion Desk 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: 4C01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 189 197 200 201 199 199 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
112% Outstanding
Read 194
Write 148
Mixed 83.9
SusWrite 197
114% 156 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
134% 1 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 112%
Great: 104%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown SP004GBLTU160N02 Samsung M378B5273EB0-CK0 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
53.6% Above average
MC Read 20
MC Write 19.3
MC Mixed 16.9
54% 18.7 GB/s
SC Read 13.1
SC Write 16.4
SC Mixed 16.1
43% 15.2 GB/s
Latency 72.9
55% 72.9 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 53.6%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $71
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback