Asus P8Z77-M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (93rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 7 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics8.91% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive66.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardAsus P8Z77-M  (all builds)
Memory5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20121109
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateNov 23 '18 at 07:42
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3470-$59
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
81.7% Excellent
Memory 93.2
1-Core 104
2-Core 206
78% 134 Pts
4-Core 407
8-Core 405
54% 406 Pts
64-Core 403
25% 403 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 81.7%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650-$112
Asus(1043 843E) 2GB
CLim: 1071 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 416.34
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
8.91% Terrible
Lighting 9.8
Reflection 9.15
Parallax 12.1
8% 10.3 fps
MRender 13.8
Gravity 12.3
Splatting 13.1
11% 13.1 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 8.91%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OS 240GB
34GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 202 233 161 167 150 178 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
66.6% Good
Read 473
Write 268
Mixed 209
SusWrite 182
63% 283 MB/s
4K Read 19.8
4K Write 43.3
4K Mixed 22.2
81% 28.4 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 139
DQ Mixed 159
144% 227 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 66.6%
Great: 69%
Mirroed Data 1TB
360GB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 107 105 108 106 110 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
58.1% Above average
Read 96.2
Write 73.8
Mixed 59
SusWrite 106
62% 83.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 1
170% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 58.1%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-012.A00LF 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
53.9% Above average
MC Read 18.8
MC Write 19
MC Mixed 17
52% 18.3 GB/s
SC Read 15.1
SC Write 17.4
SC Mixed 17
47% 16.5 GB/s
Latency 61.6
65% 61.6 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 53.9%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8Z77-M Builds (Compare 1,296 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P8Z77-M

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $442
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback