Lenovo 2441AQ9

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.68% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive40% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemLenovo 2441AQ9  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 2441AQ9
Memory10.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 色彩, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 色彩
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180611
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 27 '18 at 10:40
Run Duration210 Seconds
Run User HKG-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3610QM-$300
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
61.8% Good
Memory 78.1
1-Core 71.8
2-Core 133
57% 94.2 Pts
4-Core 247
8-Core 397
40% 322 Pts
64-Core 434
27% 434 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 61.8%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Legend(17AA 21F5) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4491
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
3.68% Terrible
Lighting 4.03
Reflection 5.31
Parallax 2.75
3% 4.03 fps
MRender 5.52
Gravity 2.27
Splatting 7.61
4% 5.13 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.68%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$41
21GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF360000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 38 2.8 2.3 36 35 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
40% Average
Read 365
Write 142
Mixed 195
SusWrite 34.6
40% 184 MB/s
4K Read 19.1
4K Write 29.2
4K Mixed 16.6
66% 21.6 MB/s
DQ Read 105
DQ Write 42.2
DQ Mixed 35.1
36% 60.7 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 40%
Great: 55%
Toshiba MK5061GSY 500GB-$57
225GB free
Firmware: MC102E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 84 85 84 84 82 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
48.5% Average
Read 86.4
Write 86.6
Mixed 24.6
SusWrite 82.3
51% 70 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
123% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 48.5%
Great: 56%
Hitachi HTS543216L9A300 160GB
20GB free, PID 110c
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 20 20 20 20 20 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
12.9% Very poor
Read 35.2
Write 33.3
Mixed 23.2
SusWrite 19.9
37% 27.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
63% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12.9%
Great: 18%
Generic External 60GB
28GB free, PID 1840
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 17 17 18 17 17 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
12.4% Very poor
Read 31.4
Write 34.2
Mixed 21.9
SusWrite 17.1
35% 26.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.5
63% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12.4%
Great: 73%
BUFFALO HD-PCU2 640GB
10GB free, PID 01d9
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.3 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.3 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
9.14% Terrible
Read 36.2
Write 27
Mixed 33.1
SusWrite 0.5
30% 24.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.6
63% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 9.14%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905417-041.A00LF Samsung M471B5273DH0-CK0 9905417-041.A00LF Samsung M471B5273DH0-CK0 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
49.7% Average
MC Read 16.9
MC Write 18.8
MC Mixed 16.2
49% 17.3 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 14.3
SC Mixed 16
43% 15.1 GB/s
Latency 84.2
48% 84.2 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 49.7%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 2441AQ9 Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 2441AQ9

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $340
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback