Today's hottest deals

MSI FM2-A75MA-E35 (MS-7721)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive82% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
SystemMSI MS-7721
MotherboardMSI FM2-A75MA-E35 (MS-7721)  (all builds)
Memory5.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130605
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateOct 14 '18 at 23:45
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-6800K APU (2013 D.Ri)-$467
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4.1 GHz
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
58.7% Above average
Memory 78.5
1-Core 72.3
2-Core 137
58% 95.8 Pts
4-Core 230
8-Core 213
30% 222 Pts
64-Core 224
14% 224 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 58.7%
Great: 61%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX100 250GB-$92
135GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 339 207 328 162 96 99 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
82% Excellent
Read 456
Write 367
Mixed 308
SusWrite 205
75% 334 MB/s
4K Read 26
4K Write 82.6
4K Mixed 38.4
132% 49 MB/s
DQ Read 239
DQ Write 214
DQ Mixed 184
149% 212 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 82%
Great: 103%
Samsung Spinpoint F2 1TB-$60
1TB free
Firmware: 1AG0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 50 58 64 64 66 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
32.2% Below average
Read 52.5
Write 36.5
Mixed 36.8
SusWrite 59.3
34% 46.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
140% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 32.2%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMX4GX3M1A1600C11 CMX4GX3M1A1600C11 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
32.8% Below average
MC Read 15.2
MC Write 6.5
MC Mixed 12.1
32% 11.3 GB/s
SC Read 7.3
SC Write 6.9
SC Mixed 9.8
23% 8 GB/s
Latency 83.4
48% 83.4 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 32.8%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical FM2-A75MA-E35 (MS-7721) Builds (Compare 110 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI FM2-A75MA-E35 (MS-7721) - $60

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 48% - Average Total price: $335
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback