Lenovo 20143

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.69% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemLenovo 20143  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20143
Memory3.9 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120430
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 04 '18 at 18:04
Run Duration106 Seconds
Run User DZA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3612QM
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
64.1% Good
Memory 74.1
1-Core 83.2
2-Core 162
62% 106 Pts
4-Core 298
8-Core 393
44% 345 Pts
64-Core 351
22% 351 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 64.1%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Legend(17AA 5003) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4276
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
3.69% Terrible
Lighting 4.07
Reflection 5.38
Parallax 3.44
3% 4.3 fps
MRender 5.24
Gravity 2.27
Splatting 7.74
4% 5.08 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.69%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2010)-$35
329GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 03.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 64 60 71 76 82 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
36.3% Below average
Read 57.9
Write 82.5
Mixed 44.4
SusWrite 68.2
46% 63.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
124% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 36.3%
Great: 50%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5673FH0-CF8 Kingston 99U5428-040.A01LF 6GB
1067, 1067 MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
35% Below average
MC Read 12.4
MC Write 11.6
MC Mixed 11.1
33% 11.7 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 12.2
SC Mixed 11.1
32% 11.3 GB/s
Latency 92.3
43% 92.3 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 35%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20143 Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20143

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 65% - Good Total price: $100
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback