Asus CROSSHAIR VI HERO

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 53%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics58.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus CROSSHAIR VI HERO  (all builds)
Memory13.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180529
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateAug 28 '18 at 01:01
Run Duration222 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 12%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 1800X-$235
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.85 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
83.8% Excellent
Memory 83.2
1-Core 118
2-Core 233
81% 145 Pts
4-Core 452
8-Core 888
79% 670 Pts
64-Core 1,299
80% 1,299 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 83.8%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
Asus(1043 0519) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1411 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 18.8.1
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
58.4% Above average
Lighting 73.9
Reflection 74.4
Parallax 92.7
60% 80.3 fps
MRender 72.2
Gravity 70.9
Splatting 60.1
55% 67.7 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 58.4%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$139
375GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 5,661
Write 7,053
Mixed 5,754
1,381% 6,156 MB/s
4K Read 162
4K Write 152
4K Mixed 142
508% 152 MB/s
DQ Read 285
DQ Write 691
DQ Mixed 762
503% 579 MB/s
Poor: 153% Great: 254%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$72
873GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 31 31 48 32 48 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
52.3% Above average
Read 144
Write 75.4
Mixed 78.7
SusWrite 37.5
62% 83.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1.1
200% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 52.3%
Great: 57%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$58
862GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 111 118 110 120 120 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 35% Great: 76%
WDC WD50 00AAKS-00V1A0 500GB
328GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 52 50 50 50 51 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Poor: 10% Great: 30%
WDC WD50 00AAKS-00V1A0 500GB
67GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 51 50 50 50 51 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Poor: 10% Great: 30%
WDC WD30 EFRX-68EUZN0 3TB
372GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 81 81 82 83 81 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
43% Average
Read 120
Write 114
Mixed 87.9
SusWrite 81.6
134% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
122% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 43%
Great: 58%
WDC WD30 EFRX-68EUZN0 3TB
1.5TB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 81 81 82 83 81 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
40.9% Average
Read 105
Write 102
Mixed 85.9
SusWrite 81.6
126% 93.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
122% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 40.9%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C14 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
109% Outstanding
MC Read 42.4
MC Write 39.4
MC Mixed 37.8
114% 39.9 GB/s
SC Read 24.8
SC Write 39.6
SC Mixed 29.8
90% 31.4 GB/s
Latency 74.9
53% 74.9 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 109%
Great: 139%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CROSSHAIR VI HERO Builds (Compare 1,771 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 92%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 91%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus CROSSHAIR VI HERO - $227

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $989
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $251WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback