QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics97.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (50%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemQEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory1.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 0 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150206
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 19 '18 at 02:47
Run Duration90 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 50%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Core2 Duo T7700
CPU 0, 2 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
54.5% Above average
Memory 75.9
1-Core 112
2-Core 207
74% 132 Pts
4-Core 192
8-Core 200
26% 196 Pts
64-Core 196
12% 196 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 54.5%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
MSI(1462 3360) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
97.4% Outstanding
Lighting 121
Reflection 141
Parallax 117
98% 126 fps
MRender 111
Gravity 133
Splatting 109
96% 118 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 97.4%
Great: 110%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Red Hat VirtIO 81GB
36GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0001
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 3,005
Write 1,766
Mixed 2,096
1,718% 2,289 MB/s
4K Read 47.4
4K Write 39.8
4K Mixed 39.5
7,101% 42.2 MB/s
DQ Read 118
DQ Write 105
DQ Mixed 104
977% 109 MB/s
Poor: 24% Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 1x4GB
1 of 1 slots used
4GB DIMM RAM
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
93.1% Outstanding
MC Read 33.3
MC Write 34.9
MC Mixed 34.4
98% 34.2 GB/s
SC Read 20.7
SC Write 33.4
SC Mixed 25.4
76% 26.5 GB/s
Latency 88.5
45% 88.5 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 93.1%
Great: 118%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) Builds (Compare 612 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

System: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $350
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $419
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback