Lenovo 10140

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics30.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemLenovo 10140  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO SHARKBAY
Memory12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131001
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateAug 01 '18 at 23:19
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4670K-$62
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
78.9% Very good
Memory 82.7
1-Core 112
2-Core 221
78% 138 Pts
4-Core 435
8-Core 430
58% 433 Pts
64-Core 430
27% 430 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 78.9%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Gigabyte(1458 3764) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 398.36
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
30.6% Below average
Lighting 38.3
Reflection 30.2
Parallax 40
31% 36.2 fps
MRender 37.9
Gravity 35.4
Splatting 34.4
29% 35.9 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 30.6%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST1000DX001-SSHD-8GB 500GB
344GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 282 300 301 300 301 299 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - drive id incomplete or inconclusive
Read 411
Write 303
Mixed 237
SusWrite 297
230% 312 MB/s
4K Read 32.4
4K Write 112
4K Mixed 39.4
7,794% 61.1 MB/s
DQ Read 374
DQ Write 301
DQ Mixed 242
2,503% 306 MB/s
Poor: 37% Great: 64%
Seagate ST4000DM006-2G5107 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: DN02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 116 113 117 117 118 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
95.6% Outstanding
Read 217
Write 210
Mixed 100
SusWrite 116
118% 161 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 4.8
4K Mixed 1.2
281% 2.47 MB/s
Poor: 76%
This bench: 95.6%
Great: 126%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5173EB0-CK0 Kingston KHX1866C9D3/8GX M378B5173EB0-CK0 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
41.8% Average
MC Read 14.6
MC Write 15.2
MC Mixed 12.2
40% 14 GB/s
SC Read 11.7
SC Write 14.3
SC Mixed 13.4
38% 13.1 GB/s
Latency 75.7
53% 75.7 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 41.8%
Great: 36%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 10140 Builds (Compare 163 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

System: Lenovo 10140

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 48% - Average Total price: $381
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback