Asus P8Z77-M PRO

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics31.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
8 years ago, 8 years ago.
MotherboardAsus P8Z77-M PRO  (all builds)
Memory5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20151215
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 16 '16 at 00:42
Run Duration82 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
80% Very good
Memory 92.2
1-Core 99.5
2-Core 199
76% 130 Pts
4-Core 393
8-Core 392
53% 392 Pts
64-Core 386
24% 386 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 80%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 670-$435
Palit(1569 1189) 2GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.6175
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
31.8% Below average
Lighting 38.7
Reflection 35.7
Parallax 49.9
32% 41.5 fps
MRender 49.4
Gravity 34.5
Splatting 36.3
32% 40.1 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 31.8%
Great: 31%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC4B Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
83.5% Excellent
Read 153
Write 138
Mixed 85.7
93% 126 MB/s
4K Read 0.96
4K Write 1.18
4K Mixed 0.4
107% 0.85 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 83.5%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT325U6CFR8C-H9 Kingston 9905402-431.A00LF HMT325U6CFR8C-H9 Kingston 9905402-431.A00LF 8GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
51.2% Above average
MC Read 16.7
MC Write 18.5
MC Mixed 16.5
49% 17.2 GB/s
SC Read 14.7
SC Write 17.6
SC Mixed 15.7
46% 16 GB/s
Latency 63.8
63% 63.8 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8Z77-M PRO Builds (Compare 753 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P8Z77-M PRO - $360

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $564
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $250WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback